Just another ModFarm Sites site
"The only kinds of fights worth having are those you’re going to lose,
because somebody has to fight them and lose and lose and lose until
someday, somebody who believes as you do wins. In order for somebody to
win an important, major fight 100 years hence, a lot of other people
have got to be willing — for the sheer fun and joy of it — to go
right ahead and fight, knowing you’re going to lose. You mustn’t feel
like a martyr. You’ve got to enjoy it."
—I. F. Stone
Here’s one for rare book collectors around the world:
Vatican Publishes Knights Templar Papers.
Enjoy!
The UK Independent says that the Only Copy of Magna Carta in Private Hands to be Sold in New York. I’m temped to say something truly obnoxious such as wonder whether the U.S. Constitution can be far behind, seeing as how the current regime in Washington D.C. has little apparent use for it, but I won’t. I don’t need to. (That’s what headlines are for.)
Just received this tidbit (which is a pretty major tidbit) from Kathleen Gundrum, the Director of Member Services at Nylink:
RLG to combine with OCLC
Combined programs and services to advance offerings
and drive efficiencies for libraries, archives, museums and other research
organizations worldwide
DUBLIN, Ohio, May 3, 2006—Two of the world’s largest
membership-based information organizations have agreed to come together. The
combined organization will offer an integrated product and service line, and
will give libraries, archives and museums new leverage in developing services,
standards and software that will help them support research and disseminate
knowledge online.
The RLG Board of Directors and OCLC Board of Trustees
have recommended that the two service and research organizations be combined
effective July 1, 2006. If approved by RLG member institutions, RLG’s online
products and services will be integrated with OCLC products and services, and
RLG’s program initiatives will be brought forward as a new division of OCLC
Programs and Research.
A combined organization would provide an opportunity
to leverage program strengths, services and innovative research initiatives, and
to deliver more value to a greater number of libraries, museums, archives and
other research organizations around the globe.
RLG is a nonprofit organization of over 150 research
libraries, archives, museums and other cultural memory institutions that designs
and delivers innovative information discovery services, organizes collaborative
programs, and takes an active role in creating and promoting relevant standards
and practices. OCLC Online Computer Library Center is a nonprofit, membership,
library service and research organization whose public purposes of furthering
access to the world’s information and reducing library costs dominate its plans
and activities. OCLC provides computer-based cataloging, reference, resource
sharing, eContent, preservation services and research to 54,000 libraries in 109
countries.
“The last few years have instilled in us all an
urgent need to find innovative, cost-effective and compelling ways to bring
research collections into the heart of the online environment and into the hands
of those who can benefit from them,” said James Neal, Vice President for
Information Services and University Librarian at Columbia University, and Chair
of the RLG Board of Directors. “It is time that RLG and OCLC take united action
if we are to realize our long-held and long-shared mutual goal of providing
information to people when and where they need it. New challenges demand new
thinking, so after deliberation and careful thought, both RLG and OCLC came to
the conclusion that the best way to serve our members’ interests was to combine
forces.”
“The OCLC Board of Trustees and OCLC management
believe that it is in the best interests of the library and cultural heritage
community in general, and the research library community in particular, for RLG
and OCLC to create a united organization that leverages our respective
strengths,” said Betsy Wilson, Dean of University Libraries, University of
Washington, and Chair, OCLC Board of Trustees. “We must work together, so that
in the years to come, the people and institutions we serve will point to our
alliance as a signal achievement in advancing research, scholarship and
education.”
RLG’s program initiatives would be continued as
RLG-Programs, a new division of OCLC Programs and Research that would provide
programs to support architecture, standards development and best practices, to
name a few.
James Michalko, who currently leads RLG, would serve
as Vice President of RLG-Programs Development, working under the leadership of
Lorcan Dempsey, Vice President of Research and OCLC Chief Strategist.
RLG-Programs would remain a membership-based organization. Its agenda would be
shaped by the needs of its members and guided by a dedicated Program Council.
“RLG-Programs will continue RLG’s successful
tradition of identifying issues and building consensus among research
institutions,” said Mr. Michalko. “When combined with OCLC’s research
capacities and robust prototyping capabilities, RLG-Programs will transform
collaborative activity for our member institutions. Through RLG-Programs
initiatives, staff from member institutions will work together to gain and share
competence in the use of new technologies, contribute to the development of new
standards, and collectively improve the ability of researchers to find and use
the rich collections that members manage on their behalf.”
RLG’s online products and services would be
integrated with OCLC service offerings as appropriate. The potential for
increased services and consolidation of costs would result in overall savings.
For example, RLIN, the RLG Union Catalog, would be integrated into WorldCat,
delivering economies of scale and reach that would benefit members of both RLG
and OCLC.
Both organizations are committed to providing
seamless, high-quality services and service levels. Any change in RLG service
offerings will be announced well in advance.
Approval of the agreement requires the assent of
two-thirds of voting RLG member institutions. Voting will conclude in early
June. RLG-Programs would maintain an office in Mountain View, California.
Staffing decisions will be made in the weeks leading up to the proposed
transition.
“We know that the RLG membership shares with the OCLC
membership a conviction to deliver access to the world’s information,” said Jay
Jordan, OCLC President and CEO. “Together, we can deliver enhanced solutions
that collect, organize, preserve and provide access to information, not just for
today, but for future generations.”
Nylink promises to keep the updates coming, and as I get them, I’ll post them here.
This is not strictly a matter for librarians (not all of them anyway), but in the spirit of Presidents’ Day, here’s
a recent speech delivered on the
floor of the
Commonwealth of
Virginia House of Delegates
by David Englin
(D-45). He quotes
President Washington, whose birthday we celebrate today; and nothing in his
speech, I suspect, would have drawn anything but approval from President
Lincoln, whose birthday we also celebrate, were he alive today.
And now, a bunch of pretty decent links:
This week’s favorite line from Techsploitation Chick: "The[rehashed dot.com companies such as] Zupits suck up funding, while true visionaries innovate for free." Not a bad thing to keep in mind in this age of big companies who want us to use their metadata in ways they determine with minimal imput from us. Controlled vocabularies are nice, but the price for their use is sometimes quite high. And huge, ostensibly metadata-friendly ILS systems with their myriad add-on services are rarely as customizable as those who sell them to us would have us believe. Anyway, read the whole thing here.
A major event in the "Woo-Hoo!" department is the Academy’s Grey Literature Report being written up in ResourceShelf. We even made Resource of the Week! (Yea!) Granted, we’re not the only repositories of Grey lit to be found with a bit of effort, but I still think we have one of the bst. But, what do I know? I merely catalog the stuff that goes into the report every couple of months.
Here’s a kind of creepy revelation from The Nation magazine: "The nation’s largest telephone and cable companies are crafting an
alarming set of strategies that would transform the free, open and
nondiscriminatory Internet of today to a privately run and branded
service that would charge a fee for virtually everything we do online." (The full article is here.)
Another related story on the same issue is here, from the NY Times. Should something like this go through (unlikely but always possible) how does one get the service of an ISP overseas? Assuming, of course, that this law would apply only to access points within the continental USA? Something to think about.
Here’s something else to think about. Granted, it’s a tiny bit dated, but I think "just plain insiring" is a good description.